Design decisions backed by reasoning, not just opinion
Stakeholder debates about ‘what looks better’ rarely end well. Lupine gives you a behavioral reason behind every friction point it finds, so your design recommendations come with evidence attached.
- Simplify confusing interactions
- Improve visual hierarchy
- Clarify navigation and information architecture
- Generate wireframe/variant concepts for key friction points
A lightweight layer on top of what you already do
Lupine doesn't replace your design process. It slots into the research, critique, and handoff work you're already doing.
Get a structured read on where the current design creates friction, before anyone opens Figma.
Back up your recommendation with the behavioral reasoning behind it, not just ‘best practice.’
Separate real usability problems from personal preference debates using evidence, not opinion.
Turn a vague ‘something feels off’ into a specific hypothesis worth validating.
From a URL to a prioritized test, in one pass
Every analysis follows the same reasoning chain — grounded in 10,000+ real experiments, not generic best practices.
Primary navigation buries the most-used entry point three levels deep.
Deep nesting increases cognitive load and drop-off for first-time visitors.
Surfacing that entry point at the top level will reduce early-session drop-off.
What teams are saying
Lupine feels like a very promising platform, especially in how it visualizes experimentation and testing opportunities — very useful for quickly communicating insights to stakeholders.
This CRO platform feels like it's heading in a really strong direction. It doesn't just highlight issues, it points you towards specific test ideas, taking a lot of the guesswork out of what to try next.